-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 At 10:19 PM 9/20/2001 +0100, Paul Crowley wrote: >Rich Salz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > Or also [XPKI certs as XML] their XML equivalents: >> > >> > http://xml.coverpages.org/xml-spki.html >> >> The referenced I-D seems to have expired and not been replaced by >> anything I can find. >> >> Does anyone have a "spki certs in xml syntax" doc? > >The "cache" link on that page carries it: > >http://xml.coverpages.org/draft-paajarvi-xml-spki-cert-00.txt > >I confess I love SPKI, and I would love to know why we're not in a >sitation where it's in widespread use today. We're getting there -- slowly. Why not faster? My theory is that it's a lack of marketing money. No one makes money off SPKI, so no one spends money to push it. BTW, I have a program (which I will post when I get my act together) showing a mapping from canonical S-expressions to XML (with the reverse mapping obvious), and that defines another XML syntax for SPKI certificates. Paajarvi didn't use it because it requires a schema (not DTD) to describe the resulting XML (because some element names are used differently in different contexts). - Carl -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA/AwUBO6sRa3PxfjyW5ytxEQJwnQCeO48tuma3AlN6r4oRyQD3VMZuqzAAoJ+W CdlBIJs5OJpGSZ7dVQ7PSZol =4nly -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Carl M. Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://world.std.com/~cme | | PGP: 08FF BA05 599B 49D2 23C6 6FFD 36BA D342 | +--Officer, officer, arrest that man. He's whistling a dirty song.-+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]