-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 At 06:44 PM 9/20/2001 -0400, Rich Salz wrote: >Thanks for the links, folks. > >> I confess I love SPKI, and I would love to know why we're not in a >> sitation where it's in widespread use today. > >I believe HP's espeak uses (used?) SPKI as its authorization certs, >but since they're chairing the Oasis SAML group that might change >(but hence my spki.xsd query). I also think Intel's open source >CDSA has some >support for SPKI (been a long time since I looked at the source), so >presumably they might be doing some stuff. One possible contender >there, the Intel medical information protection project/company, >recently shut down, however. Both are true. See http://world.std.com/~cme/html/spki.html for links to both eSpeak and CDSA. >It'd sure be nice if Win2.5K replaced SIDs with SPKI :) Yup. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA/AwUBO6sRqnPxfjyW5ytxEQImdQCfXIbQ74Jl2XoL1IzS0K+X8VEIEWgAoMR8 Ek/wqeXPzaFBmVzIp/bhDwtL =ZaJW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- +------------------------------------------------------------------+ |Carl M. Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://world.std.com/~cme | | PGP: 08FF BA05 599B 49D2 23C6 6FFD 36BA D342 | +--Officer, officer, arrest that man. He's whistling a dirty song.-+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
