John Young wrote:

Would you care to comment for publication on web logging described in these two files:

Cryptome invites comments from others who know the capabilities of servers to log or not, and other means for protecting user privacy by users themselves rather than by reliance upon privacy policies of site operators and government regulation.

This relates to the data retention debate and current initiatives of law enforcement to subpoena, surveil, steal and manipulate
log data.

I don't have time right now to comment in detail (I will try to later), but it seems to me that, as someone else commented, relying on operators to not keep logs is really not the way to go. If you want privacy or anonymity, then you have to create it for yourself, not expect others to provide it for you.

Of course, it is possible to reduce your exposure to others whilst still taking advantage of privacy-enhancing services they offer. Two obvious examples of this are the mixmaster anonymous remailer network, and onion routing.

It seems to me if you want to make serious inroads into privacy w.r.t. logging of traffic, then what you want to put your energy into is onion routing. There is _still_ no deployable free software to do it, and that is ridiculous[1]. It seems to me that this is the single biggest win we can have against all sorts of privacy invasions.

Make log retention useless for any purpose other than statistics and maintenance. Don't try to make it only used for those purposes.



[1] FWIW, I'd be willing to work on that, but not on my own (unless someone wants to keep me in the style to which I am accustomed, that is).


"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff

--------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to