Even if e=3, it should be most costly than Rabin's signature verification. Plus, using e=3 is really not a good idea.
Thanks, Peng On 6/23/05 12:03 PM, "Luigi Lo Iacono" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe the RSA public key e=3!? > > Peng Ning wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I looked the benchmark results and found something that I didn't understand. >> RSA 1024 signature verification takes 0.18 ms per operation, and the Rabin >> 1024 signature verification takes 1.61 ms per operation. Rabin signature >> verification is simply a modular square followed by a comparison. How could >> it be slower than RSA signature verification? Did I miss anything? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Peng >> >> >> >> >>
