Below is Alex's patch. I think it should it taken after some testing.
We need to test on 32-bit and 64-bit Windows, but I don't have those
environments for testing. (I can test on other platforms, like Linux BSD
and OS X to ensure no cross pollination or unintended consequences).
QUESTION: Are there any objections to taking it?
QUESTION: Can anyone assist in testing the change below?
Jeff
diff --git a/osrng.h b/osrng.h
index ae07d05..c2dba27 100644
--- a/osrng.h
+++ b/osrng.h
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ class CRYPTOPP_DLL MicrosoftCryptoProvider
~MicrosoftCryptoProvider();
#if defined(_WIN64)
typedef unsigned __int64 ProviderHandle; // type HCRYPTPROV,
avoid #include <windows.h>
+#elif defined(__CYGWIN__) && defined(__x86_64__)
+ typedef unsigned long long ProviderHandle;
#else
typedef unsigned long ProviderHandle;
#endif
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users"
Google Group.
To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected].
More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at
http://www.cryptopp.com.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Crypto++ Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
