On Thursday, July 2, 2015 at 5:44:21 PM UTC-4, jean-pierre.muench wrote: > > Hey Jeffrey, > > I really don't want to be the one to break the ideas of other people, but > there's no sed without Cygwin-style-installation > <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/127318/is-there-any-sed-like-utility-for-cmd-exe> > > on Windows. > If anyhow possible I'd prefer a solution that only lives within the source > files, so we don't have to define platform specific behavior. > The point to observe is: moving forward, the tail folks are looking for is "USE_OMP". I used sed as an example of changing it en-masse for those who wanted it.
Visual Studio's "Find in Files" works fine, too. There are also ports of sed to Windows besides Cygwin. Testing Alex's proposed changes leaves me wondering why anyone would want to use it :) It lacks a package manager, GCC has funky output (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31149950/why-does-cygwins-make-display-the-first-line-of-every-file), GCC responds to -m32 buts its broke, it lacks a bug reporter, and its man pages lack a lot information (every time I tired to do a 'man -k' I got 0 results). Jeff -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
