On Sep 10, 2015, at 17:19 , Jean-Pierre Münch <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 10.09.2015 um 22:45 schrieb Mouse:
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Jean-Pierre Münch < 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Am 10.09.2015 um 10:58 schrieb Jeffrey Walton:
>>> We have a roadmap at  
>>> <https://cryptopp.com/wiki/Roadmap>https://cryptopp.com/wiki/Roadmap 
>>> <https://cryptopp.com/wiki/Roadmap>. There's a lot of planned additions.
>> We may want to add a possibility to support variable block sized block 
>> ciphers (like Rijndael and Threefish) requiring different code paths 
>> (template specializations?).
>> 
>> Yes. And we want an AES-NI option for Rijndael. 
> I doubt AES-NI can be (ab-) used for 192- / 256-bit blocksize Rijndael.
> And we're already using AES-NI for standard AES (128-bit blocks).

It is not a matter of doubt. Apparently Intel foreseen that somebody may want 
to implement the full Rijndael rather than just its AES subset, and made it 
possible & practical. :-)

I suggest reading Shay Gueron’s introduction here 
<https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-advanced-encryption-standard-aes-instructions-set>
 - and at the end of that Web page there’s a download link for the whole 
specification aes-wp-2012-09-22-v01.pdf 
<https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/article/165683/aes-wp-2012-09-22-v01.pdf>.
 The spec is very detailed, it's 90+ pages long, and it explicitly describes 
implementing of  RIjndael with block size 256 bits using AES-NI instructions 
(among other interesting and useful things :).

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" 
Google Group.
To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected].
More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at 
http://www.cryptopp.com.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Crypto++ Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to