Please add the original BLAKE as well, not only BLAKE2. FWIW BLAKE2 is just a weakened version of BLAKE for the sake of performance. It has not been analyzed as thoroughly as the original submission. However, the original BLAKE is already one of the fastest hash functions, and there are a lot of applications for a hash function where being "faster than MD5" does not matter that much. For all such applications I would prefer the cryptographically stronger and better-studied (but still very fast) original BLAKE function.
-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Crypto++ Users" Google Group. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]. More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
