On Wednesday, April 4, 2018 at 10:25:09 AM UTC-4, mahon...@gmail.com wrote: > > Jeff, > > There is no mention of PGP in the roadmap on the Wiki (which is also 1 > version behind vs 6.2 mentioned in this group). Are there concrete plans > for including the PGP scheme? >
No, not at the moment. > I am also very much interested in PGP support due to horrible memory > management bestowed on Bouncy Castle by .NET and its mediocre performance. > Crypto++ with its tiny memory footprint and portability is miles ahead of > BC, and if it supported PGP OOB it would be a BC killer. And OpenGPG is a > joke. > Well, to lay tentative plans we would need to know use cases. In particular, what algorithms you need. It could be the case you have what you need and you only need to glue it together. Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to "Crypto++ Users". More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com and http://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/cryptopp-users. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cryptopp-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
