Did my previous answer help? Any updates?
On Thursday, April 5, 2018 at 4:29:16 AM UTC-4, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 4, 2018 at 10:25:09 AM UTC-4, mahon...@gmail.com
>> There is no mention of PGP in the roadmap on the Wiki (which is also 1
>> version behind vs 6.2 mentioned in this group). Are there concrete plans
>> for including the PGP scheme?
> No, not at the moment.
>> I am also very much interested in PGP support due to horrible memory
>> management bestowed on Bouncy Castle by .NET and its mediocre performance.
>> Crypto++ with its tiny memory footprint and portability is miles ahead of
>> BC, and if it supported PGP OOB it would be a BC killer. And OpenGPG is a
> Well, to lay tentative plans we would need to know use cases. In
> particular, what algorithms you need.
> It could be the case you have what you need and you only need to glue it
You received this message because you are subscribed to "Crypto++ Users". More
information about Crypto++ and this group is available at
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Crypto++ Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.