res wrote: > On 10.01.2007 17:04, Pablo Martin wrote: > >> Another question that arises is it seems all loaders get tested against >> any given texture (until one works at least), so defining the handled >> mimetypes doesnt seem of much use here, maybe i'm also overlooking >> something here? >> > > The MIME type is atm only used for saving. However, the solution to > check an image to load against every image loader isn't the best either. > Something that determines the image loader to use by sniffing the > content (e.g. magic values) would be nice, but no one implemented such a > thing... > > -f.r. > > ok :) thx for explanation.
PABLO ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Crystal-main mailing list Crystal-main@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crystal-main Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
