On 29.08.2010 15:04, Mike Gist wrote: > I'm not too bothered how it's done, we just need a better looking site. > If mediawiki isn't going to work so well then we should do it some other > way.
I'm against switching away from MediaWiki. I fear the chain of events would be: - Software package is changed to X so Theme Person can do a new theme for his/her favorite/known package. - Theme Person finishes new theme, but leaves migration of content to “other” people. - “Other” people don't actually have time to copy, edit and update content. - Leaves us either a good looking site with no content or a site with content but the old, “bad”, looks. -f.r.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d
_______________________________________________ Crystal-main mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crystal-main Unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
