On 29 August 2010 16:12, res <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 29.08.2010 15:04, Mike Gist wrote:
> > I'm not too bothered how it's done, we just need a better looking site.
> > If mediawiki isn't going to work so well then we should do it some other
> > way.
>
> I'm against switching away from MediaWiki.
> I fear the chain of events would be:
> - Software package is changed to X so Theme Person can do a new theme
> for his/her favorite/known package.
> - Theme Person finishes new theme, but leaves migration of content to
> “other” people.
> - “Other” people don't actually have time to copy, edit and update content.
> - Leaves us either a good looking site with no content or a site with
> content but the old, “bad”, looks.
>
> -f.r.
>
Either may happen. Otoh we don't have to switch until the new one has all
the content, so in either case it would be a nothing-lost-nothing-gained
situation.
One thing is for sure, if nobody does anything at all we'll have what we've
got forever :)
--
- Mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
Crystal-main mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crystal-main
Unsubscribe:
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
