TLDR;

Marry me? xD
________________________________
Od: [email protected] 
[[email protected]] u ime korisnika violet 
[[email protected]]
Poslato: 6. jun 2013 11:38
Za: [email protected]
Tema: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod ... Day 7

Thank you for the completely useless answers in the past 24 hours..  I will 
continue to ask the same valid question in the hopes that a member of VALVE 
will communicate, as requested.. I haven't been frustrated in my tone, I 
haven't gone "batshit", I don't care to flippantly discuss what "vanilla" 
means, and this list isn't here to kiss someone's ass with cookies and thank 
you notes.. I was just hoping to gain clarity on a valid question related to 
public players and their illusion of safety while playing on a "VAC secured" 
server while also going back to what WASN'T broken a week ago by remembered 
when CS:GO was playing nice with Sourcemod while running a Windows server.

So again I ask...

As the Valve update and the second update to fix VAC security failed (for 
Windows servers - because the Linux update works just fine with Sourcemod 
still, right?) and Allied Modders says "This is a bug on Valve's end, we will 
not be addressing it directly at this time.", what is the timing on Valve 
fixing their issue?

It's 6 (now 7) days later and whenever asked, Valve response is quiet.. PLEASE 
communicate some information to us in how this is being handled and what the 
expected timing is on your fix (for Windows servers, since Linux has been 
working the entire time).

Thank you,
Susanne
insatiable gaming

P.S. I love you all, but stay on topic.instead of bothering when you have no 
bearing. I'm sure I'll be hated for asking my very valid question a second 
time.  It was my first question on this list and I didn't expect some of the 
disappointing, off-topic, troll responses from some of you, my server managing 
colleagues :/
_______________________________________________
Csgo_servers mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers

Reply via email to