They're the same. There's 0 difference between a company and a government in terms of its interests. This is why Yanis Varoufakis is both the finance minister of Greece and helped set up Valve's economy.

I don't agree with an error code being shown. That's not enough. I'd be fine with some unknown, never-to-be-told algorithm to do its magic, and then, before the ban, let someone get in there to take a screenshot. Your proposal only tells the user which server triggered the ban, not the violation itself. And leaves me wondering as a third party if that ban was legit and I should take the risk and host for csgo.

On 26.02.2016 01:28, Don Park wrote:

I would agree then if an error code was shown with the reason (similar to the you were kicked for inactivity) that would be great. Get to know which specific server originated from it.

In regards to plugin developers. Thats irrelevant if that plugin is popular in my opinion. Just because your plugin is commonly used doesnt mean the code itself is acceptable to valve's guidelines (with all due respect to the author). Maybe a more conservative approach to coding a plugin is necessary, however further clarifications as to what exactly is prohibited would be appreciated.

Also, The relation to police or a government body is absurd. Valve is a private company. Private companies focus on maximizing profit while preserving the value of their assets as much as possible (in this case skins). A government organization focuses on maximizing benefit. The process behind it is fairly different from each other and thinking they are comparable in that manner violates the basic rules of economics. Its how the world works.

Please refrain from comparing valve to a governing organization.

Back to the topic of this email list, we all know valve's interpretation of their guidelines is the accepted rules. Therefore, would it be possible maybe to get a 'lay man's version of it made available?

On Feb 26, 2016 9:06 AM, "Matthias "InstantMuffin" Kollek" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I think it would be "nice to let them know" what the violation is,
    not what's causing it.

    The problem I previously addressed was that I can't trust either
    party with the current lack of transparency.

    But in the way you're saying it, I interpret this as an allowance
    to just put people in jail and upon the question "What did I do?",
    give them an ebook with all codes of law.
    - "Here, go figure it out for yourself"
    This is what is actually currently happening.
    Now with people being "in jail" and complaints rising I'm
    wondering what the hell is going on. I don't know what the servers
    looked like, what the violation was, and whether or not this
    actually happened and the ban was justified. I just have this
    guideline (that already let to a ton of misunderstandings in the
    past) and have to play roulette on what might have happened. With
    the unlisted option being "nothing".
    This is not how I would want to host or support a game. And not
    with my account on the line.
    "Should I host for this game?" "Well after footing the monthly
    extra bills and the other efforts, I might just suddenly get a ban
    for no reason."
    I know my answer. What is yours?

    On 26.02.2016 00:56, Don Park wrote:

    I would like to remind people that sourcemod is a mod to the
    vanilla csgo server software. Therefore, requesting which
    specific plugin within sourcemod is not allowed is outside of
    valve's parameters.

    It should be your job to investigate which plugin it is thats
    causing your account to get banned. Its not Valve's job to hold
    your hands and support third party addon's plugins.

    On Feb 26, 2016 8:47 AM, "Matthias "InstantMuffin" Kollek"
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        I'd like to add that I don't give a damn about the
        process/detection behind it.
        If I were to get a single screenshot of some sort of
        skin-menu for example with the ip in it, that would be enough
        for me.

        Also, I'd like to further express, that while I requested
        handling/punishing those servers through an interface like
        this, and while I also welcome the further measurements to be
        taken upon a violation, raising the stakes will just also
        raise my lack of trust in the system that is lacking
        transparency as is.

        On 26.02.2016 00:42, Ejziponken - wrote:
        Maybe list some of the reasons for why servers were banned?
        Because people saying they not breaking any rules and still
        get banned points to plugins that might not be seen as
        breaking the guidelines.

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
        To: [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:37:54 +0100
        Subject: Re: [Csgo_servers] [ GSLT ] - User accounts will
        also receive a temporary cooldown when their Game Server
        Login Token gets banned.

        "We have been monitoring tokens of servers operators
        complaining about their GSLT bans, and haven’t encountered a
        case yet where a GSLT ban was applied incorrectly."

        Is there a way to get some transparency here?
        The way I see it I can't believe either side. The one's
        complaining about their servers presumably being banned for
        nothing, or "you" for simply saying servers were always
        rightfully banned.
        The lack of transparency simply confuses others and
        discourages us from hosting servers for this game.

        On 26.02.2016 00:33, Vitaliy Genkin wrote:

            Recently we have banned multiple Game Server Login
            Tokens because servers using them were violating the
            guidelines. All servers determined to be in violation of
            the guidelines are tracked via their GSLT to the owner’s
            Steam User Account.

            We ban all of the existing GSLTs of this Steam User
            Account, and all existing GSLTs of all Steam User
            Accounts sharing the same phone number. We also mark
            this Steam User Account, and all existing Steam User
            Accounts sharing the same phone number, as ineligible to
            generate any more GSLTs. The phone number gets flagged
            to prevent any new Steam User Accounts from using it to
            generate more GSLTs. As of the most recent update, this
            Steam User Account and all existing Steam User Accounts
            sharing the same phone number will also get an in-game
            cooldown for a GSLT violation at the time of the GSLT ban.

            To answer some frequently asked questions among server
            operators: after the introduction of GSLTs, we no longer
            ban servers by IP addresses, we do not ban accounts
            based on shared computers, and we do not ban players for
            playing on servers that violate the guidelines. We have
            been monitoring tokens of servers operators complaining
            about their GSLT bans, and haven’t encountered a case
            yet where a GSLT ban was applied incorrectly.

            You can find the server guidelines here:
            http://blog.counter-strike.net/index.php/server_guidelines/



            _______________________________________________
            Csgo_servers mailing list
            [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers



        _______________________________________________ Csgo_servers
        mailing list [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers


        _______________________________________________
        Csgo_servers mailing list
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers


        _______________________________________________
        Csgo_servers mailing list
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers



    _______________________________________________
    Csgo_servers mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers


    _______________________________________________
    Csgo_servers mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers



_______________________________________________
Csgo_servers mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers

_______________________________________________
Csgo_servers mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers

Reply via email to