Also, adding dimensions to the svg didn’t help.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 7:59 PM Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Both width and max-width of 100% is unnecessary, you are right. I think
> it’s a left over from grabbing at straws. The dimensions on the svg was
> something I saw on an example by Sara Soueidan. It also keeps it from
> taking up space in the layout. Keep in mind the svg is for a clippath, not
> an image on the page.
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 6:32 PM Larry Martell <larry.mart...@gmail.com>
>> Just curious, why max-width instead of width since its 100% it seems
>> unnecessary. Also the svg has width height set to 0 - any particular
>> reason for that?
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 6:26 PM, Tom Livingston <tom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks Larry. I am using the -webkit prefix. After further poking
>> around I
>> > found that if I make the images parent or parent’s parent position
>> > it shows correctly but in an odd place ( not that fixed is gonna work
>> > me anyway) and if I take the width off the image parent I see the image
>> > clippath but it’s not right. It’s odd.
>> > I have to abandon this method anyway as the lack of support in Edge is a
>> > deal breaker for this but i’d still like to know what’s happening.
>> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 6:18 PM Larry Martell <larry.mart...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hey Tom-
>> >> Could this be your issue:
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/