On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 01:15:28PM +0000, Christian Heilmann wrote: > Now it is time we did the same for the enterprise level market, where > high level CMS vendors still consider CSS too hard or not flexible > enough to maintain the style of pages based on different templates and > with varying content.
It's a challenge allright, but I have to say, I don't think CSS is actually able to do what you're saying. Too much of CSS is dependent of the order of items, that I doubt you'd have enough flexibility to design whatever you want, purely with CSS. If you were not able to modify the underlying HTML you'd be restricting what you can do. However, having said that, it is a good idea for a CMS to have lots of hooks for CSS so that it can be well styled, and avoid editing the HTML as much as possible, but it's simply not mature enough to layout and entire site with, from generic HTML. (also, on another note, different pages should have different HTML, since you have a different document, with slightly different semantic structure) One-size might not suit all. - Kevin ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
