cj wrote:

>[... quite a lot ...]
>  
>
>i knew there was a reason i had to keep that globe on body.  <another
>sigh>  as you can see i did mess it up when i moved it, though when i
>put it back on body i have no idea how i can create the fixed-width
>page at resolutions over 1024 like i currently have (though the max
>isn't 1024 in the test page).  as you probably noticed the text starts
>to get really long on large screens with the browser maximized when
>you take out the max-width.
>
>
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>assuming i rework my whole theme framework (joy) to accomodate moving
>backgrounds around, is there any way i can get:
>
>- a fixed globe at the bottom of the viewport (preferably above the
>footer if the footer is showing) without putting the globe in the
>footer (because other themes use the footer and i can't really change
>that one part)
>
>- a max width of 1,000px with a color on the outside and the globe
>showing inside of the content area instead of on top of or behind the
>outside coloring (which it's doing now at larger browser sizes).
>
>- footer sticks at the bottom (like it does now).  i know
>.master-form's specified height ruins some fixes for the globe, but i
>don't know of another way that would work for the footer.
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>  
>
Wow, it's a complicated complex, but a good challenge! We have the 
expression: "It is like a wheelbarrow full of frogs: just as you have 
put back the jumped out frog, five other ones are jumping out". =-O
To tackle the long line problem, perhaps an idea (don't know it is 
possible in combination with the rest of the frogs):
- Give the .wrapper-div a width in em's, so all clientside font sizing 
is allowed, and also at big resulutions the line-length is limited.
- Then there is no need anymore to force the .master-form in a 
min-width/max-width.
- And more:  ... the globe isn't cut off at the right side anymore!
See adapted testpage 
<http://home.tiscali.nl/developerscorner/css-discuss/cj-background-nw1.htm>.

francky

ps:
Is it a rock hard condition that everything should work (perfectly) 
without javascript? Otherwise it should be possible to implement an 
AvailableWidth-sniffer, and to redirect to an appriopriate stylesheet 
for the most used resolutions; and an AvailableHeight-sniffer for the 
determination of the heights. The realist in me tells: around 90% has js 
turned on [1] ;-) , but I don't know the "asking-to-confirm" - rules in 
XP (the yellowish popup-taskbar), so that can be pretty annoying though ...

[1] thecounter.com 
<http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2005/December/javas.php>:
= = = = =
JavaScript Stats, Thu Dec 1 00:03:00 2005 - Sat Dec 31 23:58:41 2005   
31.0 Days

Javascript 1.2+: 61695870 (90%)
Javascript <1.2: 105437 (0%)
Javascript false: 6442984 (9%)
= = = = =
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to