Scott Spilker wrote:
>Thanks guys for your ideas. While it doesn't look as good (what does
>in IE), I did get the transparency issue worked out. But, the link
>problem is still giving me grief. The weird part is, the back part of
>each <li> is linking, but the image itself. But, the image is in the
>background. Everything is working correctly in FF and Safari (as far
>as I'm aware). I've started a special style sheet for IE to keep the
>junk out of my regular one. Any ideas would be appreciated. Thanks!
>
>http://clients.creative-observations.com/rturn
>
>Regards,
>Scott Spilker
>
Hi Scott,
As I asked in my first reply
<http://archivist.incutio.com/viewlist/css-discuss/73735>: why don't you
forget the png's with their IE-hack troubles?
* Instead of pasting the images directly in the background, you can
also make transparent gif's of them. For the images you used,
there is no quality loss (from 16M colors to 256 colors!) visible. [1]
* Winning lots of download speed too.
* No IE styles for this needed, no hiding IE styles needed for the
css-validator.
* In the meantime, the problem with the background clickable - but
not the img itself: solved.
See testpage
<http://home.tiscali.nl/developerscorner/css-discuss/test-rturn.htm>.
Gretings,
francky
[1] In case there are several pages with this background and this menu
(or in case this is just the only one), you can paint everything in the
body-background image (saving even more kB's).
In case there are more pages with the same menu (= menu-images), but
with a different background, you can use the example of the testpage.
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
