Marc Funaro wrote: >> [2]http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_1_06_03.xhtml > > Having read this, I think it might be wise for me to declare my > document as simply HTML. I ignorantly used XHTML only because that's > what was output originally by Photoshop on my very first foray into > an all-CSS layout.
> ... but I'm not sure what I should put in place of my XHTML > declaration... I would suggest... <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";> ...if it's gonna end up as 'tag-soup' anyway :-) If you can manage to get some kind of "control" over those CMS users, then a complete 'HTML 4.01 Strict' would be the right choice. More info... <http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/valid-dtd-list.html> <http://gutfeldt.ch/matthias/articles/doctypeswitch/table.html> regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
