Professional Web Pages - Information wrote: > Can I please get a site check on
> http://www.gnd.com.au/temp2/ Sure :-) The CSS file-size can be reduced a bit by using shorthand[1], especially for those backgrounds. You should check that those 'display: none' don't mess things up in CSS-able screen-readers. Looks like 'handheld' may get a bit messed up by media-unlimited styles. Either you include styles for 'handheld', or you don't provide any. --- W3C disagrees with your choice of doctype for pages served as 'text/html'[2], even if the validator doesn't check that. XHTML 1.0 Strict is a more correct choice. --- Generally: good looking pages, but room for improvements. Some high-contrast screens may give a nasty shimmering-effect on the background-image you're using on body - especially during scrolling. It would also be useful to add a background-color on body in case the users default (unknown variable) isn't suited if/when someone turns images off. Difficult to read links without hovering over them. All-out-white on all-out-black is a bit too much contrast - especially for reading small text, IMO. The high contrast means I'll have to bump up the font-size in order to read, which I can't easily do in IE/win because of your choice of font-size units[4]. --- I don't visit flash-spattered pages/sites if I can avoid it, but that's just a personal preference :-) regards Georg [1]http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200502/efficient_css_with_shorthand_properties/ [2]http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/tutorials/css/mediatypes [3]http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/#summary [4]http://www.w3.org/QA/Tips/font-size -- http://www.gunlaug.no ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
