Got the numbers to the references mixed up in original mail. Correct ones below.
>> http://www.gnd.com.au/temp2/ The CSS file-size can be reduced a bit by using shorthand[1], especially for those backgrounds. Looks like 'handheld' may get a bit messed up by media-unlimited styles. Either you include styles for 'handheld', or you don't provide any[2]. W3C disagrees with your choice of doctype for pages served as 'text/html'[3], even if the validator doesn't check that. The high contrast means I'll have to bump up the font-size in order to read, which I can't easily do in IE/win because of your choice of font-size units[4]. [1]http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200502/efficient_css_with_shorthand_properties/ [2]http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/tutorials/css/mediatypes [3]http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/#summary [4]http://www.w3.org/QA/Tips/font-size -- http://www.gunlaug.no ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/