Got the numbers to the references mixed up in original mail.
Correct ones below.

>> http://www.gnd.com.au/temp2/

The CSS file-size can be reduced a bit by using shorthand[1], especially
for those backgrounds.

Looks like 'handheld' may get a bit messed up by media-unlimited styles.
Either you include styles for 'handheld', or you don't provide any[2].

W3C disagrees with your choice of doctype for pages served as
'text/html'[3], even if the validator doesn't check that.

The high contrast means I'll have to bump up the font-size in order to
read, which I can't easily do in IE/win because of your choice of
font-size units[4].

[1]http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200502/efficient_css_with_shorthand_properties/
[2]http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/tutorials/css/mediatypes
[3]http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/#summary
[4]http://www.w3.org/QA/Tips/font-size
-- 
http://www.gunlaug.no
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to