David, On Nov 28, 2006, at 5:23 PM, David Hucklesby wrote:
>> On Nov 27, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Michelle Tarby wrote: >> >>> http://wwwdev.lemoyne.edu/campaign/index.html >> > On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 22:10:27 -0500, Roger Roelofs replied: >> A couple of minor items. First, your document is xhtml 1.0 >> strict, but >> your server is serving it as text/html, which is incorrect. > > Hmm. I don't think that's right. Perhaps Roger is thinking of XHTML > 1.1? Thank you for setting the record straight. For some reason, I had it stuck in my head the xhtml 1.0 strict couldn't be served as text/ html, but the transitional doctype could. After your comment prompted me to reread the relevant portions of the spec[1][2] I discovered you were absolutely right. I generally use html because that's how browsers treat the code when served as text/html, and because some browsers still don't know how to display application/ xhtml+xml[3]. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xhtml1-20020801/#guidelines [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/#summary [3] http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/03/19/dive-into-xml.html (a bit dated, but still essentially true.) -- Roger Roelofs "Remember, if you’re headed in the wrong direction, God allows U-turns!" ~Allison Gappa Bottke ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
