It's entirely true, and no-one was told. http://out-law.com/page-7594
The only ambiguity is what a 'company' consists of. I'm kind of hoping I can get away without changing anything because I'm not a company - long email footers are the devil's appendix. Regards, Barney Terry wrote: > Hi guys, > > can anyone tell me if the article below holds any weight? > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/12/21/new_web_email_regulation/ > > Thanks -- Barney Carroll Text Matters Information design: we help explain things using language | design | systems | process improvement _______________________________________________________ phone +44 (0)118 918 2382 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] web http://www.textmatters.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
