Rafael Holt wrote: > Yes, Barney knows what I mean. I feared I'd have to resort to JS and > PPK's blog is exactly what I had in mind. :)
I feel like this most days. Hehehe. > However, I still wonder whether anyone thinks position:fixed would be > more useful in this sort of implementation (doesn't move when viewport > is scrolled, but is positioned relative to any containing block, not > just the viewport). Not that I'm trying to change anything, I just > wonder if anyone has come across a situation where this would have been > useful. Could you give us a URL with a dummy of your proposal, or describe what it is you're styling in more detail? I think any compromise would have to be tailored to the situation. To be honest, I do see fixed elements as a bit of a flashy luxury - and something that is often used irresponsibly to create cumbersome designs. More than a few times I've considered finally pushing the boat out on this technique, only to realise a CSS2-only solution ended up more elegant. Regards, Barney ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
