On 3/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The problem is not with your code, the way dreamweaver displays the page > in > design mode is useless. The only true representation of a page is when you > output it to a browser. > I would not revert to table layouts just for the sake of Dreamwever. Give > him Contribute or teach some basic CSS. > > > R. > > Thanks for the replies. where i do get the fact that dreamweaver's design > view is useless to some (like developers who can actually write code) isn't > to others who don't necessarily know the ins and outs of these things. i > don't have a problem if the design is a bit off in dreamweaver yet still > shows fine in browsers. for cases where the design is completely off with > overlapping divs and paragraphs, in my eyes this is just something that will > make it very hard for people with little knowledge of the program to edit. >
for this specific case i'll just say that one rule was throwing off > everything in the design. the rule was using margins to position a div > instead of relative positioning because of the way the position: relative; > rule is wrongly inherited into child elements in IE mac. now for this i have > removed the rule so it shows fine in dreamweaver and is a bit off in the > browser. i don't like this but seeing as how it is an intranet site, they > won't be viewing it on IE mac. Jeff ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
