Alex Robinson wrote:
> ... but the W3 vaildator claims that it's not which looks like a bug in 
> the validator to me. Of course, trying to explain that to some clients 
> may be tricky.

Pity the one who finds themselves having to justify lack of css validity 
and can't... More so if it's actually significant in the client's eyes!


Regards,
Barney
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to