Alex Robinson wrote: > ... but the W3 vaildator claims that it's not which looks like a bug in > the validator to me. Of course, trying to explain that to some clients > may be tricky.
Pity the one who finds themselves having to justify lack of css validity and can't... More so if it's actually significant in the client's eyes! Regards, Barney ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/