Hi Keith, many thanks for your reply. I greatly appreciate the help. Keith DiSarno wrote: > ...<snip>... > What they were discussing was to apply some arbitrary order, just for > giggles, so everyone was on the same page. Rafael decided to use the > classic Cartestian plane (x,y) system as an order, which I believe > everyone sees no reason not to, plus it makes sense.
For sure! Thanks for all the extra info, very good explanation. :) > Answer: Order is not important and there is no set standard, so it > really is just a matter of preference. Sounds good to me. I will be switching to the Cartestian plane approach from now on. Looks like I will be thinking about this one for a few more hours though -- my brain needs time to let things sink-in. Hehehee. Have a great day/night Keith! Cheers, Micky -- Wishlist: <http://tinyurl.com/22xonb> Switch: <http://browsehappy.com/> BCC?: <http://snipurl.com/w6f8> My: <http://del.icio.us/mhulse> ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
