At 7:53 AM +1300 12/4/07, Michael Adams wrote:
>Does anyone mind if i have the "reply-to:" feild explicitly set? The
>rules for the list are not the same as most lists i am on, where "Please
>reply to the list, not to me direct" is the norm.
You'll be altering the expected list behavior for this list if you
do so, which I suppose could lead to some people getting annoyed with
you when things don't act the way they expect when replying to your
posts, but there's nothing explicitly forbidding it. If it causes
problems, I might have to revise the policies and/or Mailman
configuration accordingly. (No, I don't know how problems would
arise from this, but I'm often surprised by the darnedest things.)
For those who weren't around when the list's reply-to behavior was
defined, lo these almost six years ago, see
<http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=CssDiscussListHeaders> for
links to the original posts about it from me, as well as pro-and-con
essays written by others about the topic of reply-to munging in
general.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
"CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously."
-- Martina Kosloff (http://mako4css.com/)
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
