On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 19:42:53 +0000, John Lockerbie wrote:
> Holly,
>
> I'll check out the quirksmode. It's certainly not a case of subtle change as
> I have it
> set to black on white to test.
>
> With kind regards
> John
>
> On 05/01/2008, Holly Bergevin wrote:
>>
>>> I also have a problem with my .nav li a:active { color: #000; background:
>>> #fff; }
>>> command which doesn't work.
>>>
>>
>>>>> http://www.catnaps.org/20071217/index.html -
>>>>> http://www.catnaps.org/20071217/catnaps.css -
>>>>>
>>
>> If you're speaking still of IE7, it appears that is doesn't support the
>> :active
>> pseudo-class, according to the following page -
>> http://www.quirksmode.org/css/contents.html
>>
>> Or, is it possible that the change between the hover and the active class
>> color is so
>> subtle that you're not noticing it?
>>
>> ~holly
Actually, the :hover does not work in IE7 either. It is using the rule
for "a:hover" rather than the ".nav li a:hover" - the color changes
but not the background-color.
IE7 - and IE6, too, although my standalone IE6 applies the rule(?) -
needs an extra property change to kick it into responding.
Try adding a declaration like "background-position: 0 0;" to the
rule for ".nav li a:hover" to get IE to respond. This seems to fix
the :visited rule at the same time.
BTW - I'm not sure that a "visited" state identical to the "current link"
state is helpful to the visitor.
Cordially,
David
--
P.S. Please don't include email addresses in the body of your reply.
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
