> > It is about semantic markup, we should use HTML elements for the > > information they convey, not for how they display. > > Yes, it's all about semantic markup - the very base for conscious web > development. > > However, a general problem here on css-d is that "semantics" is pretty > much "off-topic" - unless (maybe if) the OP supply something that is so > weak on markup level that it simply can't be (visually) solved with CSS.
I see your point Georg, but imho "semantics" is "on-topic" when choices involve different type of hooks. For example nested elements (spans within list items) vs. siblings (dt/dd pairs) -- Regards, Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
