> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> discuss.org] On Behalf Of Nick Fitzsimons
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 12:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org; 'Bruno Fassino'; 'Alan Gresley'
> Subject: Re: [css-d] IE8 is better but still slightly broken
> 
> On Thu, March 6, 2008 7:07 pm, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
> > Yep, the only issues I had to fix were related to the ieMac rules being
> > picked up and the links not being "hot":
> 
> I'm curious as to why you would be fixing any of your own code to cater
> for this early beta? The idea is that if your existing, working code
> breaks, you tell the IE team and they fix _their_ code.
>
> Fixing anything now virtually guarantees that it'll be broken when the
> next beta comes out - it's a waste of time, unless it allows you to
> produce a more detailed bug report before backing the changes you've made
> out again.

IE8 was reading my IEMac rules so fixing that and the links should not break
anything later (and that
took only 2 minutes of my time). 
On the other hand, the navigation bar on my site is pretty broken in IE8,
but I won't bother fixing it because I can't think of a "safe" fix for that.


-- 
Regards,
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com




______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to