Phoebe Taylor wrote:
> I have been fiddling with...]
>
>
> I'm a bit OCD when it comes to how things look, but I guess I need to
> learn to give up some of that control for the sake of the overall
> project.  :)
>   



re: <http://www.cgraytaylor.net/>

You're looking good, and standing tall. If you're up for it, how about 
we raise the bar a notch?

Correct the couple of CSS minor (and you think you have OCD) errors, and 
validate the CSS [1]:
<http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile=css21&warning=0&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cgraytaylor.net%2F>
And correct the two markup validaton errors, and validate the markup (on 
all pages) [2]:
<http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cgraytaylor.net%2F>

[1] <http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/>
[2] <http://validator.w3.org/>

Best,
~dL

PS Validation is the very first thing you'll nailed for with a "site 
check" subjecy line...



-- 
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/

______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to