Luc wrote: > Hello David, > It was foretold that on 08/03/2008 @ 18:58:15 GMT-0500 (which was > 20:58:15 where I live) David Laakso would write: > > <snipped a bit> > > >> I'd appreciate any comments and suggestions on this 6 page comprehensive >> layout for an industrial site. The marketing target is the IE browsers. >> > > David , just a quick remark: > > wouldn't it be better to use another alternative for the e-mail? Just > to "try" to limit a bit of spam attack... > > >
**** off-list reply *** I am not sure what a spam attack has to do with the nature and purpose of the CSS-D list. My understanding is this list deals with the " practical application of CSS." As an off-topic aside, your comment regarding spam /is/ forwarded to the site owner. My own opinion is that there is no way to avoid spam. There are means available with open source e-mail clients to filter it. This seems to me to be the best approach until something better comes along. Best, ~dL -- http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
