Alan K Baker wrote:

> http://www.webbwize.co.uk/Test_Area/VTPO/

> [...] I can't see why this should be a placement problem and wonder 
> if it's to do with the way z-index is handled, or is it because I 
> have misunderstood the way that transparent images are supposed to be
>  rendered when displaced within a set size <div>?

The addition of...

.couplertab li a, .fluetab li a, .reedtab li a, .stringtab li a {
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}

...will fix the problem with the shorter background.

> [...] The correct effect can be seen on the top text for each image, 
> which is working correctly as expected.

Except that small font-sizes do not survive 'minimum font size' or
'ignore font size'.

> Can anyone think of a way of achieving this with text, as I don't 
> want to have to resort to further graphical text manipulation?

Address them as...

#navbar li a:active span { /* and style to your liking */ }

Delete the 'z-index: 200;' on '.abbreviate, .pitch' while you're at it,
as it serves no purpose.


Additional comments:

The whole construction makes me wonder why there are so many DIVs and
ULs in there, as one UL and a number of LIs with anchors would work just
fine.

All backgrounds with all states can be contained in one image, and
horizontal background-offset be used to line them up as what you have
now. Will make the whole thing less complicated I think, and one image
loads faster. You can also tune the image a bit and make it 8bit png,
which will make IE6 more cooperative.

Remember that IE6 'auto-expands' empty elements, as IE/win sees
imaginary spaces in empty elements.
Declaring 'overflow: hidden' on them or simply placing an HTML comment
as only content inside them, will make IE6 stop expanding them.

regards
        Georg
-- 
http://www.gunlaug.no
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to