Tim Dawson wrote:
> Point taken. But it seems here that R:P applied to the menu is
> sufficient, without also resorting to the z-index. It's working OK
> now.
Good.
According to CSS specs 'position: relative' without a 'z-index: (some
value)' should default to 'z-index: auto' and not affect stacking at
all, which means no difference should be observed.
IE doesn't quite follow the specs at this point, and will always stack
R:P elements above their parents level. This will indeed make a
difference - just remember that it's a bug.
regards
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
