> Seriously? Messy/disastrous coding practices aside (which can apply > to CSS layouts just as much as table layouts), but do you mean you > can make sense of your code, above, but you can't make sense of this > code, below? > > <tr> > <td id="header" colspan="3"></td> > </tr> > <tr> > <td id="nav"></td> > <td id="content"></td> > <td id="sidebar"></td> > </tr> > <tr> > <td id="footer" colspan="3"></td> > </tr> > > My code might *look* like there's more work involved in creating it, > but what you're not showing in your code is all the countless hacks > and fixes that you have to implement "behind the scenes" -- whereas > my code requires *none*, *zero*, and in all likelihood never will. > > Ron ;) > Cool, then show the sidebar on the left. Doesn't require a hack with CSS :)
The Devil does not need an advocate, seriously :) ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
