You should use h* elements instead of p elements for any kind of header. You might then not need to specify any classes and it's more semantically correct
Sent from my iPhone On Mar 26, 2009, at 9:21 AM, "Climis, Tim" <tcli...@indiana.edu> wrote: >> What about doing it backwards then put a class on the <p> and >> target the >> following <ul> > > What I'm going for is to take the bottom margin off of a paragraph > preceding a list. I don't need the list to be styled any > differently, so there's no reason to target it at all. > > Here's a list: > * Something > * Something else > > Instead of: > > Here's a list: > > *something > *something else > > So targeting the ul doesn't make much sense. What I've got now is a > "list_header" class that goes on all the p elements that are really > list headers. But I thought it would be cool if I didn't need the > class, and could just say "any paragraph before a list is a list > header" instead. > > ______________________________________________________________________ > css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
