On 3/07/2009, at 8:31 AM, MEM wrote: > Hello, > > I have tried several hasLayout workarounds for the #navcontainer > padding > problem here: > > http://www.cantinho.org/pt/cantinho-site/layout8_ups.html
By looking at the comments in the document it seems like English isn't your first language. With respect - When you read http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/onhavinglayout.html did you understand it? I appreciate that it may contain some reasonably complicated language for a non-native speaker. Have you *really* tried several hasLayout workarounds? It's very clear from the document what triggers hasLayout. You can use the IE web developer toolbar to inspect any element and check whether or not it has layout. Line 158 states that it is aimed IE6, therefore it should be inside the conditional comment for IE6. 1. Remove line 158 (width: 100%). 2. Add the following inside your IE6 conditional comment #navcontainer { zoom: 1; /* gives it layout */ clear: both; /* self explanatory????? */ } http://snadden.com/sandbox/layout8_ups.html Some people avoid zoom as it is invalid CSS. I am a wholehearted supporter of standards and always ensure that my HTML/CSS is valid, but when it comes to Internet Explorer my approach is that it gets what it deserves. Anything to make it render correctly is fine in my book as long as it's in a conditional comment so that the main stylesheet isn't polluted by IE nonsense. ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
