Benct Philip Jonsson wrote:
> On 2009-10-04 David Laakso wrote:
>> * html .infobox {height: 100px;} /* Only IE/6.0 sees this */
>
> Why?
>
> /BP
>The original poster has a row of blocks to which he assigned assigned height a of 100px so that they would all be uniform. All well and good. Or is it? In compliant browsers, when the fonts are scaled, the blocks do not expand vertically to contain the content when a /fixed/ height is set. Consequently, it was suggested that he change it to *min-height: 100px;* for compliant browsers (enabling the blocks to expand vertically). And further, that he feed the above hack to IE/6.0. The reason for the hack is that IE/6.0 does not understand (does not support min-height), and the blocks would be of unequal height when landing on the page in that browser. ~d ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
