On 16/03/2010, at 12:01 AM, Climis, Tim wrote:
>> 100%px isn't valid, unless my programming mind is tying to make too
>> much sense.
>
> I think that's the problem... His template is putting in 'px' even
> though he doesn't want one. And he wants to have a width of 100% in
> spite of it.
>
>> Stylesheets should never overwrite a style defined in the actual tag
> (Unless it's on the user's side).
>
> On the other hand, that gave me an idea that may work (completely
> untested mind you):
>
> Invalid styles should be ignored. So, if you specify "width:
> 100%px" in the inline style, and then width: 100% in the style
> sheet, it might actually get applied. It would be among the ugliest
> hacks I've ever seen though.
>
> ---Tim
>
>
You're right that's what I am trying to do. I will give it a go for
the sake of experimentation. I may even write "width(px): uglyhack% in
the joomla backend so that it can't even get a number from it!
style="width: uglyhack%px ;height: 255px;">
There goes validation ;-P
Thanks to both!
Cheers, CB
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
