MB wrote: > Bill Braun said: > >> Setting aside the moral implications, having made a transition from a >> site built completely around tables to one based on <div>, the latter, >> in my experience and opinion, takes much better advantage of CSS. I have >> been able to do everything using <div> as I did using <table>, in a much >> more flexible manner, and, again in my opinion, with a slight edge in >> favor of design aesthetics. >> > > Based on "divs"? Hello? What about "based on structural semantic markup > and CSS-layout techniques"? > > You guys - Bill, Claude - sound like you have contracted divitis* in > your migration to CSS-layout techniques. Better find a cure. >
Your interpretation is a bit on the literal side, but I am grateful for your kind words nevertheless. Bill B ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
