>This will approximately position the image; however, it is not a solution.
Thank you - I'll try that substitution - >A "real" solution would mean re-examining your layout. There is a >pixel width set on the body, and the wrappers are set in em >widths. There is a pixel width set on the body, and the wrappers >are set in em widths. - but I am happy to re-examine the layout. I have wondered about mixing up ems and pixels - before css, one didn't mix up pixels and percentages when laying out a page - but I have seen other web sites where ems and pixels are used together for layout. Should one stick to one or the other? On this site, I have set the body width in pixels because as the page content will mostly be very short on every page but I guess I should set the other element widths in pixels too, for the reasons you give. Rachel At 21:36 02/06/2010, David Laakso wrote: >Rachel Mawhood wrote: >>Hi list >> >>This new page has two background images, one in the body and one (a >>logo) in a div called #outerwall (ie the wrapper). >> >>http://www.st-alfege.org/friends-of-the-park/ >> >>Chrome seems to compute the position of the logo differently from >>other browsers and puts it about 90 pixels too far to the right. >> >> > > > >I did not look at it in Chrome. >I imagine all browsers treat it in relatively the same manner. > >This will approximately position the image; however, it is not a solution. > >#outerwall { >min-height: 100%; > >/*background-color: transparent; >background-image: url("fostp-lo.jpg"); >background-repeat: no-repeat; >background-attachment: fixed; >background-position: 87% 1%; >z-index: 2;*/ > >background: url("../friends-images/fostp-logo.jpg") 797px 10px no-repeat; >} > > >A "real" solution would mean re-examining your layout. There is a >pixel width set on the body, and the wrappers are set in em widths. > >Those users at 1152 and wider width windows will not see the image >at all; those users at less wide windows than 1024 see the image >partly covered by the content beneath it; >those users who scale-fonts, or have a min-font size setting, will >find the content text expanding both left and right and more or less >doing a number on your layout concept. > > > >Best, >~d > > > > > > > >-- >desktop >http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
