In response to the criticisms moved against my CSS template #1, here's
my point of view on that matter:
http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/12/css-vendor-prefixes-and-validation.html
Never mind the critics regarding CSS validity related to vendor
prefixes. History repeats itself, and some simply can't grasp that
browser support comes before W3C standards - and in that order.
It is a lot worse that you use this old nonsense in the stylesheet...
body { font : 62.5% }
...as that small number as base causes seriously over-sized text in a
number of browsers with 'minimum font size' set at a reasonable high
number (14px in my case) acting on _declared_ font sizes. No new
templates should contain that old nonsense, as it almost always causes
problems and broken designs for end-users that can't read small text but
know how to remedy the problem in their own browser.
regards
Georg
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [[email protected]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
