On 21/12/2010 1:10 AM, "G.Sørtun" wrote:
In response to the criticisms moved against my CSS template #1, here's
my point of view on that matter:
http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/12/css-vendor-prefixes-and-validation.html
Never mind the critics regarding CSS validity related to vendor
prefixes. History repeats itself, and some simply can't grasp that
browser support comes before W3C standards - and in that order.
Currently IE9 beta supports most of CSS3 without any vender prefixes.
The FF4 beta supports various CSS3 properties without any vender
prefixes. Most CSS hacks are valid CSS. You can validate your CSS with a
CSS3 profile. Critics of any of this are somewhat stuck in the present
or pass.
--
Alan http://css-class.com/
Armies Cannot Stop An Idea Whose Time Has Come. - Victor Hugo
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [[email protected]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
