On 25/12/2010 1:02 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Dec 24, 2010, at 11:32 PM, Alan Gresley wrote:
[snip]
Uh. Firefox 3.5 never supported css 2d transitions; that is something
new in Fx 4b - you may confuse it with css transforms.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/CSS_transitions
Ah, there is my answer, thank you Philippe.
... The transition does not work in your demo in IE9. I do not dare
download FF4b since my attempts in the pass has created conflicts
between release and beta version of FF.
I'm nor surprised, after the reviewing that release cod for IE 9.
They don't support CSS transitions, only css 2d transforms.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/ie/ff468705.aspx
Its seems that I have transforms and transitions slightly mixed up.
CSS 2d transforms would be my preferred way of doing the change in
size nowadays, fwiw.
Don't write of transitions yet. Please view in Safari 5 and Opera 11 (A
check in FF 4b would be appreciated).
<http://css-class.com/test/css/3/transition-with-min-width-and-max-width.htm>
On Dec 24, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Barney Carroll wrote:
The effect people might use jQuery for, and you've achieved with
CSS — is it the discovery of the :hover pseudo-class instead of
Javascript mouse events, or the rounded corners (or something
else)?
There is nothing particularly new in that demo, I've been using those
tricks for a few years. The only thing Alan added in reply to
Gabriele is the use of css transitions to give an impression of
sliding in/out - something that so far required js to accomplish.
Precisely. CSS can in ways replace current uses of JavaScript. I just
waited.
--
Alan http://css-class.com/
Armies Cannot Stop An Idea Whose Time Has Come. - Victor Hugo
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [[email protected]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
