On 31/12/2010 11:31 PM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
Alan Gresley wrote:
[snip]
If you have this via direct input. body { margin: 10px; src: url('../fonts/TitilliumText22L005-webfont.eot'); padding: 20px; } You get this. Property src doesn't exist : url('../fonts/TitilliumText22L005-webfont.eot') url('../fonts/TitilliumText22L005-webfont.eot') Which is almost the same as you were seeking.No it's not : it's totally different. What I am seeking is a mention of this property "src" that does not exist, not a quasi-random snippet of the CSS that (a) does not contain "src", and (b) is once again repeated for no apparent reason whatsoever.
But that is what it says. Property src doesn't exist
I am sorry, Alan, the validator seems to be a complete and utter mess at the moment, no matter how generously you seek to defend its aberrant behaviour. Philip Taylor
I'm not defending the validator. What I saying is that the validator see your syntax as junk and spit out junk in the error report. If you come back a month later it may be slightly different.
I do believe the onus is on the author to use the correct level of CSS for a correct report since CSS doesn't have a thing called a Doctype.
-- Alan http://css-class.com/ Armies Cannot Stop An Idea Whose Time Has Come. - Victor Hugo ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
