[css-d] Is @font-face 'legal'?

[Geoff Lane]

Hi All,

I've just ran one of my stylesheets through the W3 validator and was
shocked to get 4 errors and one warning returned. Three of the errors
relate to an @font-face definition and the warning claims there are no
declarations in the @font-face rule. The fourth error claims there is
no such thing as 'behavior' AFAICT.

The font definition (suitably modified to kludge IE into submission)
is:

  @font-face {
        font-family: "uechi";
        src: url("fonts/uechi.eot");
        src: local('&#40'),
                url("fonts/uechi.ttf") format("truetype");
        }

and the DIV with the behavior declaration is:

  div.navmain {
        behavior: url("csshover.htc");
        }

The stylesheet is http://gjctech.co.uk/fotp/main.css and the W3
validator output is hopefully at http://sn.im/fotpcss. The site to
which these styles apply is http://gjctech.co.uk/fotp/

I'd be grateful for a reality check as this stylesheet works in every
browser in which I've tested it and I based the above markup on
trusted samples.

TIA,

-- 
Geoff Lane
Cornwall, UK

______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/