Am 04.08.11 16:46, schrieb Philippe Wittenbergh:
That indeed fixes it. Omitting tfoot appears to be OK.
Of course - the tfoot comes after the tbody in the rendering, and
thus the counting of rows.
Error on my side. I was mistaken because tfoot needs to be defined
before tbody.
When using thead/tbody, the row count is offset by 1 (header rows
are not counted). Same goes for adjacent siblings.
That is normal, each table-row-group resets the count.
Aha! Could that confuse S5.1? Implicit reset when it sees nth-child for
th and then td?
For styling th elements a more explicit selector is needed
(assuming two rows of th), e.g.:
thead tr:nth-child(2) th:nth-child(4) { ... }
Why would that be ?
I didn't think of the reset.
tr:nth-child(1) th
works just fine. Styling the tfoot seems to be a different story,
though. I do not see any other way to reference it explicitely without using
tfoot tr:nth-child(2) td:nth-child(3) { ... }
^^^^^
Or is there?
Best regards,
Jørgen
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
