On Mar 11, 2012, at 4:58 AM, Ghodmode wrote: > > Anyway, the specific meaning of the individual terms wasn't the point. In > fact, > I just made up at least one of them. The point was that we create catchy > names > for our ideas, techniques, and technologies and that they don't necessarily > have > to be accurate.
All new technical terminology starts as some form of jargon. The success of which usually comes about as an acceptance of term definitions among those practicing the technology. Just because you not understand what a term means does not mean that it is meaningless. That was my point. Cheers, tedd _____________________ tedd.sperl...@gmail.com http://sperling.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
